Google Updates Its Content Guidelines

Google has updated its guidance on creating helpful, reliable, people-first content, placing a stronger emphasis on the quality of the main content on a webpage.

In the updated documentation, Google states that, alongside E-E-A-T, the quality of the main content is one of the most critical factors used to assess page quality. The company also provides more detail on how Search Quality Raters evaluate the content itself.

For SEO and content teams, this is an important clarification. Google is not simply looking at whether a page contains relevant keywords or follows basic optimization practices. What matters is whether the content actually helps the page achieve its purpose and provides a satisfying experience for users.

Google puts more emphasis on main content

Google defines main content as any part of a webpage that directly helps the page achieve its purpose.

This means that main content is not limited to the body text of an article. Depending on the purpose of a page, it can include:

• Primary text and media. Articles, product descriptions, images, audio, and video.
• Interactive features. Calculators, online tools, games, search functionality, and other features that directly serve the purpose of the page.
• User-generated content. Forum discussions, customer reviews, comments, and user-uploaded media when they directly contribute to the page’s purpose.
• Tabbed and expandable sections. Product specifications, safety information, reviews, and other information hidden behind interactive elements.
• Page titles and headings. Visible titles and headings that help users understand the topic and decide whether the page is relevant to them.

In other words, Google evaluates the page as a whole and considers which elements actually deliver value to the visitor.

For example, on a product page, the main content can include much more than a product description. Images, specifications, reviews, and other information that helps users make a purchase decision can all be part of the page’s main content.

How Google evaluates the quality of main content

One of the most interesting parts of the update concerns Search Quality Raters — people trained by Google to evaluate the quality of search results using the Search Quality Rater Guidelines.

Google highlights four characteristics that raters consider when evaluating main content.

Effort

The first factor is the amount of human work that went into creating the content or the systems powering it.

Examples of high-effort content include:

• original analysis;
• manually translated content;
• custom interactive tools;
• original research and materials based on real work or experience.

By contrast, automatically generating large numbers of pages from feeds or using generative AI to produce large amounts of text without human oversight or curation can demonstrate little or no effort.

An important point is that attribution alone does not replace original effort.

In other words, adding links to multiple external sources does not automatically make content valuable if the page simply repeats information that is already available elsewhere.

Originality

The second factor is whether the content provides unique information or perspectives that are not already available on other websites.

This could include:

• original analysis;
• proprietary data;
• research;
• expert insights;
• first-hand experience;
• unique examples or information.

For SEO teams, this is particularly relevant. Creating another article by collecting information from the top-ranking pages and rewriting it in different words is unlikely to provide much additional value.

A useful question to ask before publishing is:

What will users learn from our page that they cannot get from the other pages in search results?

Talent or skill

Google also considers whether the content demonstrates the skills necessary to provide a satisfying experience.

This can include:

• clear and effective writing;
• well-produced video;
• high-quality visual content;
• a functional online tool;
• an effective way of explaining complex information.

However, Google makes an important distinction: not every type of content requires specialized expertise.

For example, someone sharing their personal experience of discovering a new way to clear snow from a driveway does not necessarily need professional expertise for that content to be useful.

The required level of skill depends on the purpose and type of content.

Accuracy

For informational pages, Google expects the content to be factually accurate.

The requirements are particularly important for YMYL (Your Money or Your Life) topics — subjects that can significantly affect people’s health, financial stability, safety, or well-being.

For these topics, content should be highly accurate and consistent with established expert consensus.

This means that creating a well-written article is not enough for medical, financial, legal, or other YMYL content. Facts need to be checked, reliable sources should be used, and unsupported claims should be avoided.

What does this mean for AI-generated content?

The update is particularly relevant as businesses increasingly use generative AI in their content workflows.

Google is not saying that using AI automatically makes content low quality. The problem is using AI to mass-produce content without human oversight, fact-checking, editing, or meaningful added value.

AI can be useful for:

• organizing information;
• generating ideas;
• creating initial drafts;
• accelerating repetitive tasks;
• supporting research and content workflows.

However, content still needs human review before publication. It should be fact-checked, edited, enriched with original information, and adapted to the actual needs of the audience.

AI can make content production faster, but it does not replace original work, editorial judgment, or responsibility for the final result.

How SEO teams can apply Google’s guidance

Google’s update does not mean that websites should simply add more text to their pages.

Instead, teams should evaluate whether the main content actually fulfills the purpose of the page.

Before publishing or updating a page, consider the following questions.

Does the content fulfill the page’s purpose?

An informational article should answer the user’s question. A service page should clearly explain the value of the service and help users make a decision. A product page should provide enough information to support a purchase decision.

Does the page offer something original?

Consider adding original data, case studies, research, expert commentary, examples, or first-hand experience.

Are the facts accurate?

This is particularly important for information that changes frequently or can influence important user decisions.

Are non-text elements doing their job?

Depending on the page, the most useful part of the main content may be a calculator, comparison table, video, reviews, filter, interactive tool, or another feature — not just written copy.

Was the content created for users or simply for search engines?

If a page exists primarily to target a particular search query but provides little real value once the user arrives, its purpose should probably be reconsidered.

What this means for content strategy

Google’s update fits into a broader shift in search: it is becoming increasingly difficult to create valuable pages through keyword optimization alone.

For content teams, this means moving from:

Keyword → text → optimization → publication

to:

User need → page purpose → unique value → quality main content → fact-checking → SEO optimization

SEO is still important. Technical optimization, keyword research, internal linking, and other SEO practices help quality content become discoverable.

But they should support the content rather than compensate for its lack of value.

The bottom line

Google’s updates demonstrate once again that high-quality content is more than just text with the right keywords. Search engines evaluate how well the main content serves the page’s purpose, whether it offers original value, the quality of its preparation, and its factual accuracy.

Consequently, modern SEO goes far beyond technical optimization or writing content based solely on keywords. It requires a comprehensive approach covering site structure, content, search demand, on-site optimization, and user experience.

If your goal is not just to attract organic traffic but to convert it into actual customers, your SEO strategy must address both search engine requirements and your audience’s needs.

The UAMASTER team can help you develop and implement an SEO strategy for your business—covering everything from technical site optimization and keyword management to the creation and development of high-quality content.

Learn more about SEO services from UAMASTER →

Read this article in Ukrainian.